With the Micronic Disposable Cap Carriers
Micronic offers Screw Caps in an automation friendly cap carrier. The cap carriers are fully compatible with automated Screw Cap capping/decapping equipment offered by Micronic. The cap carriers are based on the Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening (ANSI/SLAS) standards and accommodate 96-, 48- or 24-well format screw caps. Next to that we have the Screw Cap Carrier type Hamilton. This high base cap carrier is compatible with the 96-well format internally threaded screw caps and is easily stackable. The Screw Cap Carrier type Hamilton is also based on the ANSI/SLAS standards.
Optimal compatibility
To enhance and accelerate the capping and decapping process, the Micronic (De)Capping line provides you with several options. The Screw Cap Recapper CS100 is developed to improve the manual (de)capping of tubes. The cost-effective tools are set to a precise torque value and stop turning when a perfect seal is established, ensuring an optimal sealing performance. Developed in conjunction with several leading laboratories, the Screw Cap Recapper CS500 offers the ability to cap, decap or recap a row of tubes in less than 5 seconds and a whole rack in only 1 minute. This is 10 times faster than by hand and improves productivity. The automated Screw Cap Recapper CS700 is “must-have” equipment for higher throughput users. The devices are user-friendly and extremely durable and reliable and cap entire racks in 30 seconds.
Available for caps in 24-, 48- and 96-well format
Ideal for automated capping tools like the Micronic CS700 and the CS500
Can be ordered as a prefilled carrier with any cap type and colour of your choice
Also available in a high position for automated workstations
That is our ultimate goal
Please do not hesitate to contact us
We are here to answer all your questions about NBS Scientific, our products and services.
You can also contact us to request a demo or sample, feel free to call us.
These products are also often chosen
It looks like you're coming from , is this correct?